If your doctor thinks that “germs” make you sick, unfortunately the wool has been pulled over their eyes. Sadly, they are a victim of a long-standing fraud that is part of the reason the medico-pharmaceutical industry is a blood-splattered “killing field“.
When I was a medical student, the concept of “germs” making us sick was barely questioned. In fact, it was so indoctrinated through our tuition and text books it was not even referred to as ‘germ theory’ – I only discovered that term and the related term ‘terrain theory’ years later.
If you are wondering how this situation came to be, the answer is on public display in the online encyclopaedia Wikipedia where the claim is made that:
“The germ theory of disease is the currently accepted scientific theory for many diseases. It states that microorganisms known as pathogens or “germs” can cause disease. [Germs] invade humans, other animals, and other living hosts.” [emphasis added]
One of the reasons that almost no doctors have questioned the germ theory is that a scientific theory is supposed to be one that has stood the test of time. It implies that all attempts to disprove the original idea have failed. However, the reality is something quite different and the germ hypothesis was shown to be patently incorrect long ago.
In the early 1900s, the emerging medico-pharmaceutical industry was making heroes of figures such as Louis Pasteur and Robert Koch for their apparent discoveries of disease-dealing germs. However, what has been largely hidden from the public is that contemporaries such as Dr Thomas Powell and Dr John Fraser had already disproved all of their claims. As germ theory researcher Mike Stone of ViroLIEgy reported:
“Dr. Fraser utilized millions of the highly ‘virulent’ germs of diphtheria, pneumonia, typhoid, meningitis, and tuberculosis and fed them to volunteers in various ways. In all instances in over 150 experiments conducted over a 5-year period, no disease ever occurred in any of the volunteers.”
It got even worse for the germ theorists in the Spanish flu era. The doctors and scientists of the day were convinced that the “deadliest pandemic in history” was caused by a contagious germ (later declared to be a “virus”). However, in 1918, the United States Public Health Service commissioned a series of human experiments under the supervision of Dr Milton Rosenau. All sorts of attempts were made to transmit illness from bed-bound patients to healthy volunteers including directly injecting samples from the sick into the well. The result? In no instances was the so-called highly contagious condition able to be transmitted from one person to another.
This sort of information is not known to the average doctor and most continue to believe to this day that “germs” are not only disease and death-dealing but also highly contagious. They would no doubt be astounded to read the recently published book Can You Catch a Cold? by Australian investigator Daniel Roytas who has uncovered over a century of untold medical history and collated more than 200 human transmission experiments. The conclusion is inescapable: the belief that a cold or flu can be ‘caught’ from someone else is not supported by the balance of the scientific evidence.
This is not to say that people do not get sick in clusters but it is clearly a grave mistake to conclude that these events can only be explained by “germs”. As I wrote in the foreword for Can You Catch a Cold?:
“…conditions such as scurvy and pellagra were once thought to be contagious diseases because groups of people would experience the same symptoms at the same time. Only later did it become apparent that these conditions were the result of nutritional deficiencies. People are also affected by others in numerous ways and this book documents fascinating ‘outbreaks’ of illness due to psychological factors alone.”
We have spent years searching the scientific literature for evidence that “germs” can attack healthy people and make them sick. The evidence does not exist. Instead what we have found is “indirect evidence” such as epidemiological data and a series of excuses that are continuously introduced to maintain the failed hypothesis. This includes unethical and pointless experiments that are supposed to show microbes are dangerous by injecting them directly into the lungs and brains of laboratory animals. These experiments do not replicate natural exposure routes and are further invalidated by their lack of valid controls, a crucial requirement of the scientific method.
Microbes can certainly be present and may multiply greatly in diseased parts of the body. However, they are simply acting as the clean up crew in response to what caused the tissue to become compromised in the first place. The wise doctor therefore seeks to address the underlying problem, not launch a pointless attack on the microbes that are simply doing their vital job.
It is of the upmost importance for everyone to be aware of the fallacies behind germ “theory” – not only for their personal health but also because of how this misconception is now being used as a tool to control entire societies. As we wrote in the introduction to our book, The Final Pandemic:
“Humanity is under assault from ‘pandemics’ but not for the reasons that the mainstream sources portray…The belief that germs from the natural environment (or a laboratory) are attacking us has led most of the population to go along with lockdowns, civil rights restrictions, unprecedented peacetime censorship and more vaccines.”
The choice is in our hands: continue to accept this dreadful “scientific theory” that only benefits megalomaniacs and special interest groups within the pandemic industry or call it out for the complete fraud that it is and has always been.
Dr Sam Bailey is a medical author and health educator from New Zealand. Her books include Virus Mania, Terrain Therapy and The Final Pandemic.
- Subscribe and follow her on Substack
- Access Drs Mark & Sam Bailey’s articles and videos at drsambailey.com
