The prime minister is outraged federal prosecutors did not oppose bail for a released immigration detainee, before he allegedly assaulted a Perth grandmother during a home invasion.

The released detainee, a 43-year-old man who was freed following a High Court ruling in November, was one of three people charged over the assault of Ninette Simmons and her husband Philip.

Anthony Albanese said the decision by prosecutors not to oppose bail for the detainee after reoffending had taken place was troubling.

“That wasn’t a decision of government … I am just as upset about that decision as you are. I think that lacks common sense,” he told Seven’s Sunrise program on Friday.

“We recognise that community safety is the absolute priority.

“My heart goes out to Ninette, no one should be subject to that sort of violence. It is an outrage that this occurred.”

Mr Albanese also took aim at his own government-appointed community protection board, which was set up following the High Court ruling, after it recommended the detainee not be required to wear an ankle bracelet.

Emergency laws passed by federal parliament after the court ruling imposed strict monitoring conditions on the released detainees, including electronic monitoring and ankle bracelets.

The prime minister admitted it was a failure by the board not to have the ankle bracelet at the time.

“That’s the wrong decision by that board, but they make the decisions independent,” he said.

“The government has had to deal with the implications of (the High Court case) and the results of that, we’ve been trying to do that, we’ve put in a range of laws … we want to take as strong an action as possible.”

But opposition foreign spokesman Simon Birmingham said the prime minister was avoiding owning up to the situation.

“He seems to be completely washing his hands and those of his ministers of any responsibility at all. It’s all somebody else’s fault,” he told Sky News.

“The prime minister’s comments today will be seen by many, not least of whom are victims of these released detainees, but by many others across the community to be woefully inadequate, terribly weak and lacking in accountability.”

Opposition Leader Peter Dutton said there was understandable community anger over the assault.

“People are right to be angry about it and upset, this could be anybody’s grandmother or mother,” he told Nine’s Today program.

“(Immigration Minister Andrew Giles) has responsibility here, the first charge of the prime minister of our country is to keep people safe, not to put them in harm’s way, and that’s what’s happened.”

The coalition has repeated calls for Mr Giles and Home Affairs Minister Clare O’Neil to resign following the assault.

Government Services Minister Bill Shorten said the decision by the community protection board not to recommend the use of ankle bracelets was an error.

“They made a decision to not put an ankle bracelet on this fellow because previously he hadn’t shown any crimes of violence, but I agree … that is a mistake,” he told Today.

“As a human being and as someone in public life who represents the community, I do not understand some of our bail laws, and I do not understand some of the decisions made to give these people freedom when they shouldn’t have it.”

Opposition immigration spokesman Dan Tehan said Mr Giles needed to resign.

“The minister for immigration either lied to the Australian people about the government’s monitoring regime, or he didn’t know what was happening in his portfolio on an issue of critical importance to public safety,” he said.

“Either way, he has to go.”

By Andrew Brown in Canberra