24.9 C
Canberra
Friday, January 31, 2025

CSO presents ‘Miracles in the Age of Reason’

Conductor Benjamin Bayl considers Jean-Philippe Rameau the greatest composer of dance music until Tchaikovsky and Stravinsky. โ€œA fairly bold claim to make,โ€ he admits โ€“ but Canberra audiences will have the chance to hear the 18th century Frenchmanโ€™s music in a CSO concert next week.

Miracles in the Age of Reason, on Wednesday and Thursday nights, 18-19 May, should be a stellar concert. It also features a flute concerto by C.P.E. Bach, written for Frederick the Great โ€“ and played by Emma Sholl on a 14-carat rose gold Burkart flute; one of Mozartโ€™s last and greatest symphonies; and, as a counterpoint, a piece by 20th century Australian composer Richard Meale.

โ€œWhat ties all these four works together is that all the composers diverge from the status quo somehow,โ€ Bayl, who has flown out from Germany to conduct the concert, explained. โ€œThey challenge the norms of other composers, or of formal expectations, or the way that things should be, or could be, done.

โ€œAll these composers had a knack of writing with an original voice, of being able to use structure to their advantage, to be so adept at composition that they were able to take the road less travelled and succeed.โ€

Rameau was the first composer ever described as โ€˜baroqueโ€™, a term applied now to music of the early 18th century. It was a criticism: Rameauโ€™s music was too new and too different. The organist and musical theorist wrote his first opera when he was 50.

โ€œThe brilliance of his music,โ€ Bayl said, โ€œcomes from the fact that he knew so much about harmony and melody, that somehow, when the time came to compose, he knew how to break all the rules and be original. Even at the time, Rameauโ€™s music was not accepted immediately, because it was regarded as just so out there.โ€

Jean-Philippe Rameau, painting by Jacques Aved, 1728.

Hippolyte et Aricie (1733) struck Paris like a thunderbolt, and divided music lovers into โ€œtwo violently extreme parties, enraged against each otherโ€, one contemporary wrote: the progressive supporters of Rameau (the ramistes or ramoneurs) and the conservative lullistes, who preferred the 17th-century operas of Lully. โ€œThe older and the newer music was for each of them a kind of religion for which they took up arms.โ€

There was too much music, too much harmony, too much learning, too much everything in Hippolyte, some contemporaries felt โ€“ used as they were to Lullyโ€™s rather stilted works, with their formulaic plots and music, and bootlicking prologues praising Louis XIV as the greatest hero who ever lived, the equal of various Roman gods. Rameau himself considered Lully his master and guide, but, a later critic wrote, โ€œit was the art of Lully with a very great advance in musical richness, variety, suppleness, and colourโ€.

Listeners were amazed by the new and surprising harmonies and innovative instrumentation, including the extraordinary, enharmonic Trio of the Fates. โ€œThereโ€™s enough music to make ten operas,โ€ exclaimed the composer Andrรฉ Campra; โ€œthis man will eclipse us all.โ€ And the great writer Voltaire hailed Rameau as the greatest musician in France, โ€œour Euclid-Orpheusโ€. Twenty-odd operas followed, of which the best known is Les Indes galantes, something like a Broadway revue, with the delightful Grand Calumet de la Paix (based on a Native American dance).

In next weekโ€™s concert, Rameau is represented by a suite of dances from his later opera Platรฉe (1745), a grotesque comedy about a vain, toad-like swamp nymph who believes Jupiter has fallen in love with her โ€“ โ€œA particularly irreverent piece as opposed to all the serious tragedies of French opera at the time,โ€ Bayl said. โ€œItโ€™s not a story you would expect from a Louis XIV-type world at all. Heโ€™s already a composer who dared to write with his tongue in cheek.โ€

The dances themselves exhibit elegance and playfulness, sophistication and irreverence, and end with a storm scene.

โ€œHe seems effortlessly to be able to constantly reinvent all the different dance forms from the earlier French Baroque. Gavotte or bourrรฉe, sarabande, passepied, or gigue, thereโ€™s no two alike. โ€ฆ The rhythmic and harmonic daring that he manages to put into them is something which certainly no other composer of that time was able to match. Nobody springs to mind between then and the great Russian ballets of the 19th and 20th centuriesโ€ฆ Itโ€™s almost unbelievable to think Rameau wrote this music in the 1740s, because it sounds to my ears very modern with the musical risks that he takes.โ€

Frederick the Great’s flute concert in Sanssouci, by Adolph von Menzel, 1852.

While there are plenty of violin and oboe concertos, flute concertos from the 18th century are unusual, Bayl notes. C.P.E. Bach (1714โ€“88), son of the great Johann Sebastian, wrote his Flute Concerto in D minor for Frederick the Great, King of Prussia. The monarch was a noted flute player โ€“ but even he found it challenging. The Sturm und Drang third movement (allegro di molto) work is โ€œvery fast and furious, and incredibly virtuosic for the fluteโ€, Bayl said โ€“ but the andante second movement, however, could almost be an opera aria in its placid beauty.

โ€œ[C.P.E. Bach] is another composer with an incredible musical pedigree and education, but still managed to break from the mould, and develop a very original voice in early classical music. Heโ€™s a bridge between the Baroque and classical styles.โ€

Emma Sholl. Photo: Ranui Young.

Richard Mealeโ€™s Cantilena Pacifica belongs squarely to the 20th century: a peaceful song written for the death of his best friend from cancer. Meale recalled that its emotional truth marked a departure from his earlier avant-garde style.

โ€œLots of Mealeโ€™s early works were much more atonal and experimental,โ€ Bayl said. โ€œIn this one, he almost comes back to a simpler, clearer musical language.โ€

The work was a late substitution; originally, Bayl planned to conduct Mealeโ€™s Lumen, a chamber piece that fit more into the Enlightenment theme, but there was no orchestral version.

โ€œItโ€™s good to have an Australian work in the program, and there werenโ€™t many Australian works from the 1780s to choose from!โ€

Canberra Symphony Orchestra musicians. Photo: Martin Ollman.
Mozart, painting by Barbara Krafft, 1819.

The concert concludes with Mozartโ€™s Symphony No. 39 in E-flat (1788); one of his three last symphonies, it takes a turn towards more experimental ideas, instrumentation, and harmony, Bayl argues.

The โ€œvery grand, nobleโ€ first movement (Adagio โ€“ Allegro) could almost be the overture of an opera, while the second movement (Andante con moto) starts in very simple, almost teasing short phrases, then goes through the most tortured harmonic sequences in the middle.

โ€œโ€œYou never quite know where the harmonies are going to end up,โ€ Bayl said. โ€œItโ€™s like he goes through every possible key before he stops himself. I think thatโ€™s kind of cool.โ€

Mozart ditches the oboes in favour of the clarinet โ€“ then a relatively new instrument โ€“ for the third movementโ€™s Trio, while the fourth movement (Allegro) ends suddenly, without the expected coda.

โ€œThe mark of a composer who is extremely confident in his skills, and loves to tease or surprise his audiences.โ€ Many of whom, in those days, were seldom attentive: โ€œThey were often sitting in their boxes, having a drink or some food โ€“ or heaven knows what else! Sometimes, the performance on the stage might have taken second place.โ€

Not that thereโ€™s any danger of that in the CSOโ€™s concert, with such a feast of innovative music.

CSO presents Llewellyn Series: Miracles in the Age of Reason, on 18-19 May 7.30pm, Llewellyn Hall, ANU School of Music. Tickets: cso.org.au.

More Stories

ย 
ย 

ย 

Latest

canberra daily

SUBSCRIBE TO THE CANBERRA DAILY NEWSLETTER

Join our mailing lists to receieve the latest news straight into your inbox.

You have Successfully Subscribed!